There is no evidence to disprove the Parsi identity and Gandhi last name of Feroze Gandhi; this last name isn't property of one family or religion, and accusations to the effect that this last name or his being Parsi wasn't true, aren't substantiated. Moreover, very importantly, its extremely unlikely that muslims will refrain from claiming their own.
As for the Nehru family, assertions about their being not Kashmir Pandit are equally without evidence to substantiate the claims, and all these are pretty silly endeavours without such evidence.
What's more important is that such accusations are wasting time and effort, and obfuscating the real issues. Which is, the citizen ship and other frauds perpetrated by the current president of congress and his mum the ex president of congress, apart from gigantic financial scams.
As per information unearthed by Dr Subramanian Swamy, neither of them is a citizen of India and never were, since she never gave up her other passport(s), and he was registered immediately on being born as Italian citizen when she called the Italian embassy for the purpose.
Their henchmen go around on internet claiming there is no proof they are not citizens of India, and they automatically are since they are family of the late ex PM of India, but by this logic which is exactly along U.S. right wing militant lines, congress also justifies those that say Obama cannot be a U.S. citizen and must be an African muslim. Fact is opposite in both cases, of Obama family and of the family of current president of congress and his mum.
Fact is, they are known to have used their other passport(s), and there is no evidence of such other passport(s) having been surrendered.
That is only about Italian passport of each of them, but there might be others too.
As per information unearthed by Arnav Goswamy team while he was still at Times Now, the current president of congress had claimed British citizenship on his tax returns filed in UK, while he was already MP in India, which was illegal in India if his claim was true, and financial fraud in UK if he lied. This he did more than one year.
But there are more dangerous likelihoods.
As per information unearthed by Dr Subramanian Swamy, the lesser known grandfather of the current president of congress is not, could never have been, Mr Maino, because around those years he was in Siberia as a POW and Mrs Maino was visiting her mother in an Italian town near Swiss border, where there was then a German military camp.
So, very possibly, the current president of congress had a Nazi, possibly SS, grandfather, which means very possibly he and his mum might very well have passports from Germany and half a dozen countries of South America where nazis fled, and they might be in touch with ODESSA.
India won freedom with hard fight for over a millennium and half, despite congress lying and claiming it was all peaceful, and losing it only to have ODESSA regime in power, just because India forgot the dangers or never knew what fascists and nazis are or were, would be stupendously stupid.
Forget about whether Feroze Gandhi was in fact a Parsi, or Gangadhar Nehru a Kashmiri Pandit. That can be checked at leisure, and evidence is lacking if they were not.
Serious likelihood of the frauds of the current president of congress and his mum being not citizens, and being of not only the known fascist but lesser K niwn Nazi SS DNA, are the threats to India. And those are just the top at the list of their frauds, the list including their education qualifications as claimed and publicised, and of course the billions of dollars of theft via scams perpetrated while the family was directly in power (and not just living with the second PM of India from this family).
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UFpd7ho6QKk
.............................................................................................
The following is a conversation that went on in a pattern where the fraudulent posts of the other person being exposed for what they were resulted in him removing his responses to my posts and posting more disinformation elsewhere down the line.
0:25 - 1:29 specific part of Indian constitution that applies.
2:58 - 3:45 what Nehru wrote and his government decreed re heir to Holkar kingdom
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3211rCnwEmY
can only be more true for important positions of government of India, and all the more so for someone of purely foreign origin, of course; but, as Subramanyam Swamy clarified, the constitutional clause in Indian Constitution is explicit re mutuality of such possibility.
Responding to a comment below, by the same congress pro who had tried to and failed in conversation above and deleted his replies to my post, about "Indian law being not defined by Italy" and other attempts to shame, provoke and bamboozle India:-
Re "Sonia Gandhi is a Naturalised Citizen of India.", is precisely what Dr Subramanian Swamy has pointed out is untrue if she never renounced all other citizenships, and there is no proof she renounced ANY!
According to Dr Subramanian Swamy, when she could no longer hold on to being a non citizen, the then PM Indira Gandhi instructed the official in question to accept the Italian ambassador's statement, which only said to the effect that she had told him she had surrendered it, but not that she had in fact done so.
Re mutuality clause, Italy or any other nation does not define law in India, India dies so with clause of reciprocity. Bamboozling India with such shameful attempts to provoke is typical of fascists heritage.
8:30 If he had to leave Harvard due to cocaine, it is likely well documented, under whatever name he used there; probably the verification would not easily be available unless one is an insider, which Dr Swamy definitely is at Harvard.
+Velington Fernandes Either you are really obtuse or deliberately bullying with lies. Your contention about
"Sonia G became Indian before 1991. Doesnt it logically imply that Rahul
Gandhi becomes Indian as soon as the day Sonia Gandhi became an Indian citizen which is before 1991"
is absurd and false in several points.
To begin with a parent's citizenship might give choice of that right to the child but it is not forced, and her having to become citizen of India however reluctantly does not indicate her son being made to go through that transition, much less imply it as necessarily so.
There is nothing logical or reasonable about a child having to be citizen of a country if a parent chooses it, if there are other choices and in particular a choice already made for the child.
You sound like the racist US right wingers who claim Obama is not a US citizen because his father was not. That is silly and false.
Sonia did not take citizenship of India until she was forced to, by Indian law, alternative being her husband having to choose strictly between her and his prime ministership of India. That was '84, long after she lived in the home of his mother the prime minister for years, and this does not support the idea that her son would be Indian by her choice.
2:58 - 3:45 what Nehru wrote and his government decreed re heir to Holkar kingdom
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3211rCnwEmY
can only be more true for important positions of government of India, and all the more so for someone of purely foreign origin, of course; but, as Subramanyam Swamy clarified, the constitutional clause in Indian Constitution is explicit re mutuality of such possibility.
9:45 so that's the reason for name and passport with that name! Does India have dual citizenship agreement with Italy, or is this an exception?
Responding to comments below questioning Dr Subramanian Swamy about his expose of the current and the now ex presidents of congress, claiming there is no proof of his statements, and calling him a lier :-
To begin with, if you don't see a chain of logic, or that facts can be claimed easily enough if they are opposite of what Dr Subramanian Swamy says, that points st your own questionable mindset, capabilities, or possibly worse. As to proof, there is no proof that the posts calling Dr Subramanian Swamy a lier or questioning his statements were written by genuine persons, rather than agents paid with scam funds in Swiss accounts of the mafia family.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3211rCnwEmY
re mutuality
3:45 - 4:56!
7:30! And thanks for bonus, hope it all works (canceling such amendments). If we need someone from elsewhere appointed to take care of India, someone with more education and competence, honesty and career should be considered - Hilary Clinton, for example.
7:30 - 10:08!
10:49 Varun certainly should do for dynasty fans, unless the foreigner quotient is necessary, which no one would be silly enough to admit to.
Responding to a comment below, by the same congress pro who had tried to and failed in conversation above and deleted his replies to my post, about "Indian law being not defined by Italy" and other attempts to shame, provoke and bamboozle India:-
Re "Sonia Gandhi is a Naturalised Citizen of India.", is precisely what Dr Subramanian Swamy has pointed out is untrue if she never renounced all other citizenships, and there is no proof she renounced ANY!
According to Dr Subramanian Swamy, when she could no longer hold on to being a non citizen, the then PM Indira Gandhi instructed the official in question to accept the Italian ambassador's statement, which only said to the effect that she had told him she had surrendered it, but not that she had in fact done so.
Re mutuality clause, Italy or any other nation does not define law in India, India dies so with clause of reciprocity. Bamboozling India with such shameful attempts to provoke is typical of fascists heritage.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2GyT9dqHxLk#dialog
As for the Nehru family, assertions about their being not Kashmir Pandit are equally without evidence to substantiate the claims, and all these are pretty silly endeavours without such evidence.
What's more important is that such accusations are wasting time and effort, and obfuscating the real issues. Which is, the citizen ship and other frauds perpetrated by the current president of congress and his mum the ex president of congress, apart from gigantic financial scams.
As per information unearthed by Dr Subramanian Swamy, neither of them is a citizen of India and never were, since she never gave up her other passport(s), and he was registered immediately on being born as Italian citizen when she called the Italian embassy for the purpose.
Their henchmen go around on internet claiming there is no proof they are not citizens of India, and they automatically are since they are family of the late ex PM of India, but by this logic which is exactly along U.S. right wing militant lines, congress also justifies those that say Obama cannot be a U.S. citizen and must be an African muslim. Fact is opposite in both cases, of Obama family and of the family of current president of congress and his mum.
Fact is, they are known to have used their other passport(s), and there is no evidence of such other passport(s) having been surrendered.
That is only about Italian passport of each of them, but there might be others too.
As per information unearthed by Arnav Goswamy team while he was still at Times Now, the current president of congress had claimed British citizenship on his tax returns filed in UK, while he was already MP in India, which was illegal in India if his claim was true, and financial fraud in UK if he lied. This he did more than one year.
But there are more dangerous likelihoods.
As per information unearthed by Dr Subramanian Swamy, the lesser known grandfather of the current president of congress is not, could never have been, Mr Maino, because around those years he was in Siberia as a POW and Mrs Maino was visiting her mother in an Italian town near Swiss border, where there was then a German military camp.
So, very possibly, the current president of congress had a Nazi, possibly SS, grandfather, which means very possibly he and his mum might very well have passports from Germany and half a dozen countries of South America where nazis fled, and they might be in touch with ODESSA.
India won freedom with hard fight for over a millennium and half, despite congress lying and claiming it was all peaceful, and losing it only to have ODESSA regime in power, just because India forgot the dangers or never knew what fascists and nazis are or were, would be stupendously stupid.
Forget about whether Feroze Gandhi was in fact a Parsi, or Gangadhar Nehru a Kashmiri Pandit. That can be checked at leisure, and evidence is lacking if they were not.
Serious likelihood of the frauds of the current president of congress and his mum being not citizens, and being of not only the known fascist but lesser K niwn Nazi SS DNA, are the threats to India. And those are just the top at the list of their frauds, the list including their education qualifications as claimed and publicised, and of course the billions of dollars of theft via scams perpetrated while the family was directly in power (and not just living with the second PM of India from this family).
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=UFpd7ho6QKk
.............................................................................................
The following is a conversation that went on in a pattern where the fraudulent posts of the other person being exposed for what they were resulted in him removing his responses to my posts and posting more disinformation elsewhere down the line.
0:25 - 1:29 specific part of Indian constitution that applies.
2:58 - 3:45 what Nehru wrote and his government decreed re heir to Holkar kingdom
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3211rCnwEmY
can only be more true for important positions of government of India, and all the more so for someone of purely foreign origin, of course; but, as Subramanyam Swamy clarified, the constitutional clause in Indian Constitution is explicit re mutuality of such possibility.
Responding to a comment below, by the same congress pro who had tried to and failed in conversation above and deleted his replies to my post, about "Indian law being not defined by Italy" and other attempts to shame, provoke and bamboozle India:-
Re "Sonia Gandhi is a Naturalised Citizen of India.", is precisely what Dr Subramanian Swamy has pointed out is untrue if she never renounced all other citizenships, and there is no proof she renounced ANY!
According to Dr Subramanian Swamy, when she could no longer hold on to being a non citizen, the then PM Indira Gandhi instructed the official in question to accept the Italian ambassador's statement, which only said to the effect that she had told him she had surrendered it, but not that she had in fact done so.
Re mutuality clause, Italy or any other nation does not define law in India, India dies so with clause of reciprocity. Bamboozling India with such shameful attempts to provoke is typical of fascists heritage.
8:30 If he had to leave Harvard due to cocaine, it is likely well documented, under whatever name he used there; probably the verification would not easily be available unless one is an insider, which Dr Swamy definitely is at Harvard.
+Velington Fernandes Either you are really obtuse or deliberately bullying with lies. Your contention about
"Sonia G became Indian before 1991. Doesnt it logically imply that Rahul
Gandhi becomes Indian as soon as the day Sonia Gandhi became an Indian citizen which is before 1991"
is absurd and false in several points.
To begin with a parent's citizenship might give choice of that right to the child but it is not forced, and her having to become citizen of India however reluctantly does not indicate her son being made to go through that transition, much less imply it as necessarily so.
There is nothing logical or reasonable about a child having to be citizen of a country if a parent chooses it, if there are other choices and in particular a choice already made for the child.
You sound like the racist US right wingers who claim Obama is not a US citizen because his father was not. That is silly and false.
Sonia did not take citizenship of India until she was forced to, by Indian law, alternative being her husband having to choose strictly between her and his prime ministership of India. That was '84, long after she lived in the home of his mother the prime minister for years, and this does not support the idea that her son would be Indian by her choice.
2:58 - 3:45 what Nehru wrote and his government decreed re heir to Holkar kingdom
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3211rCnwEmY
can only be more true for important positions of government of India, and all the more so for someone of purely foreign origin, of course; but, as Subramanyam Swamy clarified, the constitutional clause in Indian Constitution is explicit re mutuality of such possibility.
9:45 so that's the reason for name and passport with that name! Does India have dual citizenship agreement with Italy, or is this an exception?
Responding to comments below questioning Dr Subramanian Swamy about his expose of the current and the now ex presidents of congress, claiming there is no proof of his statements, and calling him a lier :-
To begin with, if you don't see a chain of logic, or that facts can be claimed easily enough if they are opposite of what Dr Subramanian Swamy says, that points st your own questionable mindset, capabilities, or possibly worse. As to proof, there is no proof that the posts calling Dr Subramanian Swamy a lier or questioning his statements were written by genuine persons, rather than agents paid with scam funds in Swiss accounts of the mafia family.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3211rCnwEmY
re mutuality
3:45 - 4:56!
7:30! And thanks for bonus, hope it all works (canceling such amendments). If we need someone from elsewhere appointed to take care of India, someone with more education and competence, honesty and career should be considered - Hilary Clinton, for example.
7:30 - 10:08!
10:49 Varun certainly should do for dynasty fans, unless the foreigner quotient is necessary, which no one would be silly enough to admit to.
Responding to a comment below, by the same congress pro who had tried to and failed in conversation above and deleted his replies to my post, about "Indian law being not defined by Italy" and other attempts to shame, provoke and bamboozle India:-
Re "Sonia Gandhi is a Naturalised Citizen of India.", is precisely what Dr Subramanian Swamy has pointed out is untrue if she never renounced all other citizenships, and there is no proof she renounced ANY!
According to Dr Subramanian Swamy, when she could no longer hold on to being a non citizen, the then PM Indira Gandhi instructed the official in question to accept the Italian ambassador's statement, which only said to the effect that she had told him she had surrendered it, but not that she had in fact done so.
Re mutuality clause, Italy or any other nation does not define law in India, India dies so with clause of reciprocity. Bamboozling India with such shameful attempts to provoke is typical of fascists heritage.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2GyT9dqHxLk#dialog
