These comments, and my response to comments by others, were related to the politics being played out by the opposition where they claimed to oppose the government and support the military, despite their latter claim being evidently fraudulent.
......................................................................................................
https://www.facebook.com/RepublicWorld/videos/1773484332765439/?hc_ref=ARRGEL3qxqgm-ADqWyiykKoIB4b2HMS1FGk0qClky9S1EWSPB3A7CqvOzfZqf0V6wOU
......................................................................................................
Responding to a comment below the original fb post on Republic tv page by Ghulam Mohammad Bhat
Ghulam Mohammad Bhat
"Every human beings will condemn killings in KASHMIR.... "
Kashmir only? How about three million in East Bengal, thousands in Baluchistan, terrorist attacks around the world from Sydney to Paris to N.Y. to CA, millions killed in india in name of faith by conversionists last millennium and half, killings of security force personnel by terrorists in Kashmir, pakis targeting civilians in Kashmir by not only shelling but snipers shooting babies and children, .... or is killing of anyone by Muslims not to be condemned by your law? How about murder of Daniel Pearl and other US personnel by terrorists? Invoking humans and humanity for convenience of public support, shutting up everyone about East Bengal '71, Baluchistan, and every other murder by terrorists in name of killing for faith? Fraud!
Responding to a comment, and another in the following discussion, below the original fb post on Republic tv page, about citizenship and trauma re rg
Small corrections - One, Ashok Majumdar, it wasn't birthplace, but yes, immediate registration as citizen of Italy after birth due to the mom calling ambassador in Delhi, as per information by Dr Subramanian Swamy; that citizenship isn't surrendered, not as of his Harvard stint, and as per discovery by Arnav Goswamy team a year and more ago, rg personally claimed UK citizenship on tax forms submitted in UK while he was MP in India. So yes there is much questionable, in both current and ex president of congress cases, probably the rest of them too.
Two, Yash Pal Sehgal, everyone can sympathise with trauma of the little boy, but if that deserves PM position of India, you have to in all fairness either invent a few thousand copies of India or do a public lottery, for he isn't the only one with sacrifices for nation by family and trauma thereof. Let's begin with family of Lakshmibai the Queen on Jhansi, or better yet, Prithviraj Chauhan; go on till every Indian soldier martyred on duty through history is included. What are you blind in your feudal loyalty? Being PM of India or any other position private or public is about ability to do work, not family history, unless this is your non Indian, western style caste system, of royalty and aristocracy and landed gentry and loyal peasants. Not India!
Responding to a comment Bolusani Dilip Kumar Gupta -
offering PM position to jinnah was Gandhi's doing, I believe Richard Attenborough did his research and did not lie in his film, and congress habitually obeyed Gandhi even when they did not like it, as in various examples before and after independence. Avoiding partition might have avoided the bloodbath and had a stronger India. But really partition wasn't doing of the ancestors of current residents of pak, and jinnah merely profited from it. Reality, it was planned in finality the day USSR - and not US or UK - tanks rolled into Berlin, planned by Churchill, as per tarek Fateh - you should hear him. U.S. and UK needed a secure country with unfettered use of military bases, to be used against USSR, Jawaharlal Nehru refused to give such permanent bases in india, jinnah promptly said yes when asked, hence pak. Ever thought why he always refused everything asked when he was offered the exact thing? When offered PM position he demanded whole cabinet to be league! Jawaharlal Nehru has been wrongly blamed by some dissatisfied congress leader of yore for partition to equate him with jinnah. But as per very high spiritual authority he, Jawaharlal Nehru, was an honest, sincere man of good heart, whose soul is united with India after his leaving his body. The same spiritual source also suggested to congress leaders then to accept the alternative proposal by a British leader to avoid partition, but Gandhi was too egotistic to accept it, and refused it by saying those that did not work with him had no business making suggestion. There is much hidden under the usual story by congress, but targeting Jawaharlal Nehru or suspecting him is the usual easy - and incorrect, but safer - direction! Yes, he made mistakes, of an honest good heart, he ought to have had Bose and Patel with him, which was not to be because of Gandhi sidelining them and removing them from positions of authority they were elected to. The three together would have been far better. And as for Indira Gandhi, whatever her mistakes or faults, her rescue of East Bengal must count as stupendous humanitarian victory in face of heavy odds. She too had the same spiritual backing, but lacked the courage to go further and complete the task. One may question if return of the 93,000 POW without conditions was smart. The war criminals were promptly sent to execute the same mission in Baluchistan. There too India nade mistakes earlier, and those and other similar ones could have possibly been avoided if only India had the benefit of more than just one decent Jawaharlal Nehru leading, if only the wise and bold Patel, and courageous, intelligent Bose, were together with him.
Responding to a comment below the original fb post on Republic tv page about Indian ancestry, loyalty, etc:-
Really it isn't about whose parent isn't Indian, much less about race - India has loved and adopted so very many who loved and adopted India with true heart! From Sister Nivedita to Tom Alter, countless, and more - but when a lie about citizenship and more is perpetrated and that too at level of those trying to be PM, it has gone too far. Ever wonder why there is so much attack against young minister Ms Smriti Irani, and even against PM Narendra Modi of India, re education? It's simply because the current and ex president of congress have been exposed in this regard too, apart from the citizenship question, by Dr Subramanian Swamy, and later by Arnav Goswamy team a year and more ago 're citizenship of the current congress president. Now there is a barrage calling him well educated! Hear them, and who sound not quite all there, or even lying, and who come across consistently erudite, true, reasonable and concerned about India? Former, always pushing rg, always against BJP; latter, those not branding BJP falsely! Being able to claim a certificate or show a thesis alone usually wont guaratee a position teaching in a good university, even, unless an interview by a panel of experts can see the qualities of the person claiming the education. By those criteria a very different picture is evident, one obvious to everyone who has heard the various people mentioned here. Funny, never thought then that one day one would come to think that the younger of the two sons of the then PM was not so bad, but the prospect of her grandson with half his DNA sourced from axis is far too terrorising. Jawaharlal Nehru had ruled, in case of the Holkar family, in favour of the descendent with purely Indian roots to inherit the title. Even if the position of PM of India were by inheritance, and it should not be, surely the rule should not be different?
Responding to a comment below the original fb post on Republic tv page, by Yash Pal Sehgal, re sacrifices by family:-
Yash Pal Sehgal, position of PM of India isn't inherited nor is it awarded by ancestors's sacrifices, but if that deserves PM position of India, you have to in all fairness either invent a few thousand copies of India or do a public lottery, for he isn't the only one with sacrifices for nation by family and trauma thereof. Let's begin with family of Lakshmibai the Queen on Jhansi, or better yet, Prithviraj Chauhan; go on till every Indian soldier martyred on duty through history is included. What are you blind in your feudal loyalty? Being PM of India or any other position private or public is about ability to do work, not family history, unless this is your non Indian, western style caste system, of royalty and aristocracy and landed gentry and loyal peasants. Not India! And what's more, Jawaharlal Nehru himself had decided in favour of the descendent with purely Indian roots to inherit the title of Holkar family when he dealt with the dispute of two descendents, surely that rule must be good enough for his descendents if the position of the PM of India were hereditary for any reason, which it is NOT? But those pushing for rg aren't even loyal to Nehru legacy, only bought by money and slaves to racism, forgetting that the dangerous half DNA of rg isn't even half but in fact full axis! So if you are beating the drum of blood, then no India should not be ruled by a descendent of fascist blood much less worse than fascist DNA, as per information by Dr Subramanian Swamy. You must be completely ignorant about nazis, SS and about DNA to think heredity of a quarter Nehru and another quarter more Indian makes it wipe off the axis half. But if it did, you would value all the descendents of Jawaharlal Nehru equally, not forgetting one who IS purely of Indian roots.
Responding to a comment below the original fb post on Republic tv page by Bolusani Dilip Kumar Gupta,
re your "Pandit Nehru denied PM post to Jinnah caused to seprated nation", do get over this accusations conveniently levelled against a convenient but incorrect target! Partition was inevitable once Cripps proposal was refused by Gandhi, unless the whole government were given to jinnah, not just jinnah heading a democratic government of India - he was firmly with feudal interests, they funded his league and weren't about to be part of democracy, and got high positions in pak just by handing over suitcases filled with cash. Do get over the propaganda against the good man spread by the interests that did not rue partition of India, only that of the particular minority, hence blame Nehru. Do hear Tarek Fateh, and do once for all realise you are indirectly supporting a horrible man who ordered direct action day in Calcutta which killed ten thousand (mostly Hindus) by knives in three days of killings, to force Gandhi to accept partition, while you are of the stupid idea that such a guy (and not a good man that Jawaharlal Nehru was) was better for India!