JV spoke at a law college, presumably in a question and answer format, at length, about the then very hot topic of standing up for the national anthem.
In this regard it might be apropos to refer to the speech at RSS convention by the Sarasanghachaalaka, Mohan Bhagwat, who referred to anti national movements and firces behind them, and asked people to reflect on what the said forces are attempting to achieve via destruction of India as a nation.
Obviously it's about taking control, and not for life of India, but for draining India for benefits of their own.
..............................................................
Standing up for national anthem is reminding this "lawyer" of nazis?
Would he dare loll about during anthem elsewhere?
The moron is either idiotically stuck on the word "nation" 10:00, or is pretending to be so, but seriously could he travel to China and publicly give slogans telling the Chinese to not salute the flag and not stand for the anthem? Or is he willing to go public in india declaring chins is nazi?
By his definition, are mosques all Nazi, since they do enforce half a dozen times, no allowance for freedom of either dress or speech or any other conduct that's not in accord with those rules?
JV assumes 10:00 - 10:30 the moron knows anything about European history, or flatters him for avoiding a debate on that topic, but it's unlikely this guy knows anything other than the propaganda that uses terms like "freedom of soeech" that the morons are attracted by due to not thinking.
About EU 13:00 - 13:45, actually its other way round - indua is comparable with Europe in diversity, and in fact has far more diversity than Europe, and EU is Europe attempting to emulate the example of India with baby steps.
JV hits the nail 15:00 - 15:30 on head!
The lawyer 18:00 - 18:30 asks why he has to express his love for his three children identically; the question to him should be, how about their freedom of choice of expression, which might be - instead of calling him dad or papa, or doing pranam, or anything considered appropriate - hitting him on head with a hammer, or mooning him in public, or setting fire to his bed while he is deep asleep?
Flag is just cloth 19:15 - 19:42 like koran is just squiggles on processed wood pulp and those protesting the anthem are tomorrow's " ashes to ashes, dust to dust".
Would this guy 20:22 "express his diversity" in church by going against the decorum, say, by playing drums?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eultr6gLUuI
In this regard it might be apropos to refer to the speech at RSS convention by the Sarasanghachaalaka, Mohan Bhagwat, who referred to anti national movements and firces behind them, and asked people to reflect on what the said forces are attempting to achieve via destruction of India as a nation.
Obviously it's about taking control, and not for life of India, but for draining India for benefits of their own.
..............................................................
Standing up for national anthem is reminding this "lawyer" of nazis?
Would he dare loll about during anthem elsewhere?
The moron is either idiotically stuck on the word "nation" 10:00, or is pretending to be so, but seriously could he travel to China and publicly give slogans telling the Chinese to not salute the flag and not stand for the anthem? Or is he willing to go public in india declaring chins is nazi?
By his definition, are mosques all Nazi, since they do enforce half a dozen times, no allowance for freedom of either dress or speech or any other conduct that's not in accord with those rules?
JV assumes 10:00 - 10:30 the moron knows anything about European history, or flatters him for avoiding a debate on that topic, but it's unlikely this guy knows anything other than the propaganda that uses terms like "freedom of soeech" that the morons are attracted by due to not thinking.
About EU 13:00 - 13:45, actually its other way round - indua is comparable with Europe in diversity, and in fact has far more diversity than Europe, and EU is Europe attempting to emulate the example of India with baby steps.
JV hits the nail 15:00 - 15:30 on head!
The lawyer 18:00 - 18:30 asks why he has to express his love for his three children identically; the question to him should be, how about their freedom of choice of expression, which might be - instead of calling him dad or papa, or doing pranam, or anything considered appropriate - hitting him on head with a hammer, or mooning him in public, or setting fire to his bed while he is deep asleep?
Flag is just cloth 19:15 - 19:42 like koran is just squiggles on processed wood pulp and those protesting the anthem are tomorrow's " ashes to ashes, dust to dust".
Would this guy 20:22 "express his diversity" in church by going against the decorum, say, by playing drums?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eultr6gLUuI
