Are they talking about this now or is this older video posted again?
"India gave 162 million U.S. dollars too", for construction of paki dams in '60s? And "no other dams were constructed" 2:00 - 2:18, so pakis scammed the money?
He mentions the amount twice 5:00 - 5:12, first "180 billion (U.S.) dollars" and immediately next as "180 million (U.S.) dollars"; is there a comfusion?
This guy fraudulently refers as pakis do 5:15 - 8:30 to Kashmir as "occupied" while he means the opposite, and specifies then that he is referring to Indian military in Kashmir.
This guy fraudulently refers as pakis do 5:15 - 8:30 to Kashmir as "occupied" while he means the opposite, and specifies then that he is referring to Indian military in Kashmir. Pakis, despite having caused mayhem in Kashmir beginning immediately post independence, and having achieved ethnic cleansing of minorities of Kashmir Hindus with murders of hundreds and orders to leave via terrorist diktats issued over mosque loudspeakers through nights in January 1990, are now constantly complaining about presence of military of india in the very border state they keep infiltrating with terrorists trained in camps all across paki territory and especially all the more so along the line of control in paki occupied parts of Kashmir. It's hard to imagine what logic they think they expect anyone hearing them to apply to this complaining about presence of military in a border state that's not at peace precisely due to their attacking it via every means they can, including the first attacks in 1947, without which Kashmir might very well have remained independent. Kashmir accession was signed to India due to desperate need of defence of Kashmir against paki invasion in the first place. Now he invokes the Indus water treaty, but his nation has never complied with any treaty beginning with birders drawn at partition and including the Simla agreement about the line of control. But then pakis have never had any problem breaking very rule of human decency, judging by not only their behaviour in Afghanistan, Baluchistan and East Bengal, but even in those parts of Kashmir that are occupied by pakis since 1947, by invading and calling it tribal.
"Whole world acknowledges that Siachen glacier is melting due to presence of Indian military" 8:30 - 8:51 he says -why not blame his own nation for invading Kashmir in the first place, and China for invading Tibet and the military presence of China in Tibet? Fraudulent accusations limited strictly to attacking India is why, of course. For that matter, U.N. resolution required withdrawal of all paki military from Kashmir, which pakis never complied with.
He says that the world is in agreement about "the glaciers in Karakoram under paki control are growing while Siachen being the only one thats melting" 9:00 - 9:20; he seems unfamiliar with gkaciers melting in Greenland, Antarctica and Andes, to mention a few of the major global warming consequences around the globe, but his first assertion too seems questionable since pakis have not only conceded that part of the territory of Kashmir occupied by them to China for asking, they - pakis - even argue on internet, on YT, to the effect that "it's very hard to go there, no one goes there, what's the problem for India if China is given the land by pakis, ..."!
And as to watershed 9:30 - 9:56, his logic about pakis "must control" the watershed of their rivers can't be unique to just pakis, it ought to apply to the whole earth, which, to begin with, requires Indian control of all Himaalayan ranges, is he advocating Chinese withdrawal out of Tibet much less India be given Tibet? Extending it to the whole world, is he demanding Switzerland be divided between France and Germany, and southern Germany be occupied by East European nations along the Donau?
He claims China is helping India despite being a friend of pakis 10:00 - 11:21, perhaps they need to examine if they have angry friends or they are flattering themselves, whether or not the first part about China helping India is correct or true; he goes on to speak of dams in Afghanistan, does that amount to a necessity of world taking notice that pakis are getting ready to occupy Afghanistan and wreak havoc again in the poor country?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XG4NtaalYYs
"India gave 162 million U.S. dollars too", for construction of paki dams in '60s? And "no other dams were constructed" 2:00 - 2:18, so pakis scammed the money?
He mentions the amount twice 5:00 - 5:12, first "180 billion (U.S.) dollars" and immediately next as "180 million (U.S.) dollars"; is there a comfusion?
This guy fraudulently refers as pakis do 5:15 - 8:30 to Kashmir as "occupied" while he means the opposite, and specifies then that he is referring to Indian military in Kashmir.
This guy fraudulently refers as pakis do 5:15 - 8:30 to Kashmir as "occupied" while he means the opposite, and specifies then that he is referring to Indian military in Kashmir. Pakis, despite having caused mayhem in Kashmir beginning immediately post independence, and having achieved ethnic cleansing of minorities of Kashmir Hindus with murders of hundreds and orders to leave via terrorist diktats issued over mosque loudspeakers through nights in January 1990, are now constantly complaining about presence of military of india in the very border state they keep infiltrating with terrorists trained in camps all across paki territory and especially all the more so along the line of control in paki occupied parts of Kashmir. It's hard to imagine what logic they think they expect anyone hearing them to apply to this complaining about presence of military in a border state that's not at peace precisely due to their attacking it via every means they can, including the first attacks in 1947, without which Kashmir might very well have remained independent. Kashmir accession was signed to India due to desperate need of defence of Kashmir against paki invasion in the first place. Now he invokes the Indus water treaty, but his nation has never complied with any treaty beginning with birders drawn at partition and including the Simla agreement about the line of control. But then pakis have never had any problem breaking very rule of human decency, judging by not only their behaviour in Afghanistan, Baluchistan and East Bengal, but even in those parts of Kashmir that are occupied by pakis since 1947, by invading and calling it tribal.
"Whole world acknowledges that Siachen glacier is melting due to presence of Indian military" 8:30 - 8:51 he says -why not blame his own nation for invading Kashmir in the first place, and China for invading Tibet and the military presence of China in Tibet? Fraudulent accusations limited strictly to attacking India is why, of course. For that matter, U.N. resolution required withdrawal of all paki military from Kashmir, which pakis never complied with.
He says that the world is in agreement about "the glaciers in Karakoram under paki control are growing while Siachen being the only one thats melting" 9:00 - 9:20; he seems unfamiliar with gkaciers melting in Greenland, Antarctica and Andes, to mention a few of the major global warming consequences around the globe, but his first assertion too seems questionable since pakis have not only conceded that part of the territory of Kashmir occupied by them to China for asking, they - pakis - even argue on internet, on YT, to the effect that "it's very hard to go there, no one goes there, what's the problem for India if China is given the land by pakis, ..."!
And as to watershed 9:30 - 9:56, his logic about pakis "must control" the watershed of their rivers can't be unique to just pakis, it ought to apply to the whole earth, which, to begin with, requires Indian control of all Himaalayan ranges, is he advocating Chinese withdrawal out of Tibet much less India be given Tibet? Extending it to the whole world, is he demanding Switzerland be divided between France and Germany, and southern Germany be occupied by East European nations along the Donau?
He claims China is helping India despite being a friend of pakis 10:00 - 11:21, perhaps they need to examine if they have angry friends or they are flattering themselves, whether or not the first part about China helping India is correct or true; he goes on to speak of dams in Afghanistan, does that amount to a necessity of world taking notice that pakis are getting ready to occupy Afghanistan and wreak havoc again in the poor country?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XG4NtaalYYs
